Secondly, I know Logan, and I also know that Logan is hilarious. That’s why his post about him being extraordinary was taken for exactly what it was. A joke. I even hassled him for it.

Third, This is Logan’s Blog. I’ll repeat in case it’s unclear. THIS IS HIS BLOG. He can post whatever he wants on it, and allow whatever he wants on it, and also censor whatever the hell he chooses. If you don’t like it, stay away.

All that being said. Logan…You are extraordinary and don’t you forget it. Seems like you have some pretty base friends who can’t tell a joke when it’s sitting on their face.

Who do you think you are, Logan? It seems with each passing day you become more full of yourself. You can be a really nice guy, but you build up this wall of egotistical bullshit to keep people from hurting your feelings. It’s stupid and tiresome.

I wrote under a pseudonym because it didn’t matter who I was. The fact is that several people feel the same way (do you remember high school?). I’m not one guy with personal problems. I’m just one guy willing to call your bluff.

“This was never about you, so please stop making it that way.”
Really? Stop obfuscating the readers. You quoted me in your post.

Please grow up soon.

And I don’t think my post was masturbatory. Maybe my ego is inflated, but I think over-inflated is an exaggeration. More importantly, you are taking this completely out of context. The point wasn’t to stroke my ego, but to prove that claiming to be extraordinary isn’t that ridiculous—and it’s not.

The main problem with you is that you clearly have personal issues with me. I don’t know who you are—aside that you’re posting somewhere in Tennessee, but I surmise that I know you from high school and that I offended you in some way. And if I did: get over it. Stop living in the past and hiding under pseudonyms and face your problems.

This was never about you, so please stop making it that way. Also—please reread this post and learn from the precepts that I established.

I would like to make it clear that I do, in fact, have legitimate claims. I felt I stated them in no uncertain terms, but if you feel that an explanation or a rephrasing is necessary, I will gladly oblige. I claimed that your post was masturbatory in that its sole purpose, in my opinion, was to stroke an over-inflated ego. I also stated that the sheer magnitude of your ego was extraordinary. By this, I meant that you are extraordinarily conceited, arrogant, megalomaniacal, etc. (If this is unclear, I can offer more synonyms at some later time.) These claims are legitimized by your posting on your own blog a list of ways in which you are superior to most.

Do you know what the verb to obfuscate and the word “inane” mean, respectively? I’ll help you out.

obfuscate
1 a: darken b: to make obscure
2: confuse

My comment obfuscated nothing. I did not confuse the reader. My opinion of you was apparent. If not, I offer my sincerest apologies to you, your readers, and the internet, generally.

inane
1 : empty, insubstantial
2 : lacking significance, meaning, or point : silly

Was my comment really inane? Did I lack a point? Were my claims unsubstantiated?

You claimed that you “didn’t publish [my comment] because it violated [your] terms for commenting (which just really boils down to don’t be an idiot).” You’re insinuating here that I’m an idiot. I may not be smarter than most, but I’m certainly no idiot.

I only hope that this comment meets the bar for excellence, that you consider it the “well-formulated” writings of an individual who is not an idiot.